MENGAPA INOVASI DIBUTUHKAN DALAM PENENTUAN PRIORITAS KEBIJAKAN ANGGARAN DESA

Authors

  • Shadu Satwika Wijaya Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56655/jid.v1i2.27

Keywords:

Local Autonomy, Mass Elite Model Policy Actor Public Budgeting, Rural Development

Abstract

A village's budgeting process is crucial to the village's overall financial cycle. Research on public budgeting is urgently needed because democratization necessitates transparency regarding the utilization of village transfer funds. According to the findings of previous research, the village government's budgeting performance has been quite optimal in terms of the planning, implementation, and budget utilization processes. There are still conditions that are not yet aligned between priorities and budget allocations to preferences for basic service needs for the community. However, the good performance of this budgeting has not been matched by efforts to prioritize the basic service needs of rural communities. This study analyzes the data using the theory of actor relations in public policy as a result .The research was done using a qualitative method, and the locations of the study were 24 randomly selected villages in the Cilacap Regency. Stakeholders in the development of village-level budgeting policies are the focus of this study. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was used to gather data. According to the findings of this study, there is a disconnect between the activities program included in the Village Government Budget (APBDes) and the requirements of the village community. At the village government elite level, there was little discussion following the aspirations screening.

References

Anderson, J. E. (2011). Public Policymaking, 7th edition. In Media.

Barker, L. (2019). Definition of Development Planning. Publication Career Trend.

Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. H. (2013). Introduction to Managerial Decision Making. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 1–10.

Blau, J. (2010). The dynamics of social welfare policy. In The dynamics of social welfare policy (3rd ed.). https://www.lib.uwo.ca/cgi-bin/ezpauthn.cgi?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/622119059?accountid=15115%0Ahttp://vr2pk9sx9w.search.serialssolutions.com?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/PsycINFO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:k

Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Method, 3rd Ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Cairney, P. (2019). Understanding Public Policy. In Understanding Public Policy. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35699-3_10

Daud, N., & Soleman, R. (2020). Effects of fiscal decentralization on economic growth and human development index in the Indonesian local governments. Management Science Letters, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.7.012

Ding, Y., McQuoid, A., & Karayalcin, C. (2019). Fiscal decentralization, fiscal reform, and economic growth in china. China Economic Review, 53, 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.08.005

Fraussen, B., & Halpin, D. (2018). How do interest groups legitimate their policy advocacy? Reconsidering linkage and internal democracy in times of digital disruption. Public Administration, 96(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12364

Fyall, R., & McGuire, M. (2015). Advocating for Policy Change in Nonprofit Coalitions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1274–1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014558931

Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2012). Policy agenda-setting studies. Attention, politics and the public. In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 167–174). https://doi.org/doi:10.4324/9780203097571

Hadden, J. (2018). The Relational Sources of Advocacy Strategies: Comparative Evidence from the European and U.S. Climate Change Sectors. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12217

Ibrahim, M. (2019). Designing zero-based budgeting for public organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.25

Kelly, T. (2004). Unlocking the Iron Cage: Public Administration in the Deliberative Democratic Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Administration and Society, 36(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703257268

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. In Governance Networks in the Public Sector. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887098

Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Varone, F., & Hill, M. (2018). Public policy analysis. In Public Policy Analysis. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3324749

Kurniasih, D., Simin, & Wijaya, S. S. (2020). Rural Budgeting Organization in Indonesia. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v7i010.02

Kusuma, M. W., & Badrudin, R. (2016). Fiscal decentralization effect on economic growth in Bali. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol8.iss2.art6

Lindblom, C. E. (1959). Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19.

Lindblom, C. E. (2018). The science of “muddling through.” In Performance Based Budgeting (pp. 39–55). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498411

Malgwi, A. A. ., & Unegbu, A. O. (2012). Budget in Nigerian Public Sector: Need for Balanced Scorecard Perspective. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijfa.20120102.01

Messinger, L. (2006). Social Welfare Policy and Advocacy. In Sexual orientation & gender expression in social work practice: Working with gay, lesbian, bisexual, & transgender people. (pp. 427–459). http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc5&NEWS=N&AN=2006-02520-019

Miles, M. B., Michael Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods Sourcebook (3rd Edition). In SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221402800402

Molenaers, N. (2012). The great divide? Donor perceptions of budget support, eligibility and policy dialogue. Third World Quarterly, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.677311

Molenaers, N., Cepinskas, L., & Jacobs, B. (2010). Budget support and policy / political dialogue Donor practices in handling ( political ) crises Nadia Molenaers. IOB Discussion Paper Nr. 6.

Rochefort, D. A. (2019). American Social Welfare Policy. In American Social Welfare Policy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429036583

Rubinstein, A. (2020). Modeling Bounded Rationality in Games. In Modeling Bounded Rationality. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4702.003.0010

Secchi, D. (2010). Extendable Rationality: Understanding Decision Making in Organizations. In Media.

Sharma, U., & Frost, D. (2020). Social capital and the budgeting process: a study of three organisations. Accounting Forum, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1777637

Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of Bounded Rationality. In Models of Bounded Rationality. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4711.001.0001

Slavinskaite, N., Novotny, M., & Gedvilaite, D. (2020). Evaluation of the fiscal decentralization: Case studies of european union. Engineering Economics, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.1.23065

Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2018). The Public Policy Theory Primer (3rd Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352

Stewart, J., Hedge, D. M., & Lester, J. P. (2008). Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach. In Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach.

Stojcic, N., & Tolic, M. S. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of fiscal decentralization on economic growth. Ekonomicky Casopis, 67(3).

Stout, M. (2011). In Search of a Holistic Public Policy Theory Primer. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02350.x

Thomas. (2013). Pengelolaan alokasi dana desa dalam upaya meningkatkan pembangunan di Desa Sebawang Kecamatan Sesayap Kabupaten Tana Tidung. Ejurnal Pemerintahan Integratif, 1(1).

Tropman, J. E., DeNitto, D., & Dyie, T. R. (1983). Social Welfare: Politics and Public Policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(4), 661. https://doi.org/10.2307/3323637

Velupillai, K. V. (2017). Models of Simon. In Models of Simon. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462447

Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Mortensen, P. B. (2018). Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking. In Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 55–101). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284-3

Williamson, K., Given, L. M., & Scifleet, P. (2017). Qualitative data analysis. In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition (pp. 453–476). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00019-4

Wolff, S. (2015). Eu budget support as a transnational policy instrument: Above and beyond the state? Public Administration, 93(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12177

Downloads

Published

2022-12-07

How to Cite

Wijaya, S. S. (2022). MENGAPA INOVASI DIBUTUHKAN DALAM PENENTUAN PRIORITAS KEBIJAKAN ANGGARAN DESA. Jurnal Inovasi Daerah, 1(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.56655/jid.v1i2.27